Search Suggestions

      When Rage Becomes Policy: The Manufactured Division Behind Charlie Kirk’s Death

      Date:  September 21, 2025

      Charlie Kirk’s assassination is already being weaponized through the Hegelian dialectic—crisis, reaction, control. Each side is being pushed to hate the other, while the ruling class tightens its grip in the chaos.

      Conservative activist Charlie Kirk was shot and killed during an outdoor event at Utah Valley University in Orem on Wednesday. Horrifying video showed a single round striking him about 20 minutes into his speech; Utah’s governor called it a “political assassination.” Reports indicate the shot may have been fired from a nearby building, and a person of interest has been detained, though police have not identified a suspect or motive. National outlets quickly confirmed the key facts while emphasizing how much is still unknown.

      The immediate reactions online revealed just how divided the nation has become—despite no arrest and no motive. Some on the left openly celebrated the killing, justifying it as righteous vengeance.

      On the right, voices quickly called for suspending due process and even fantasized about revolution. The details of the shooter weren’t even public before people chose their narratives. The murder became a mirror, reflecting the worst instincts of both sides.

      This reflex didn’t appear in a vacuum. For years, corporate media have drenched the public in catastrophe language—framing Donald Trump as “literally Hitler” and casting the United States as if already in a Weimar-era collapse. Trump deserves criticism—he is overseeing the creation of a police state, presiding over opaque coordination between the federal government and tech firms to usher in a technocratic nightmare, and floated deploying the National Guard into U.S. cities—a move that echoes the standing army our forefathers warned us about. He has embraced sweeping tariffs that punish ordinary Americans under the banner of nationalism. And his constant stream of hateful rhetoric doesn’t just inflame his base—it plays directly into the hands of the radical left, giving them the ammunition they need to frame the entire country as living under fascism. People have every right to be angry. But media figures didn’t stop at critique—they turned millions of voters into symbols of fascism, fueling the dangerous delusion that America in 2025 is morally equivalent to Nazi Germany.

      On the right, the paranoia runs in the opposite direction but is equally worrisome. Many insist the U.S. is already in a race war, where white Americans are under siege. They attach themselves to tragic killings and use them to justify their fears and hatred. These voices now fold Kirk’s killing into their narrative, treating it as proof that civil war is inevitable. The result is a dangerous symmetry: one side believes they are fighting fascism; the other believes they are fighting extinction. Both sides dehumanize the other, and both sides are wrong.

      But being wrong didn’t stop high-profile influencers from leaning into the chaos. Accounts like Libs of TikTok and Andrew Tate tweeted openly about civil war, pouring gasoline on a fire that doesn’t need more fuel. This isn’t analysis. It’s incitement.

      Let’s call Kirk’s assassination what it is: an act of terrorism. And like any act of terrorism, its power lies not in the bullet but in the reaction. Terrorism radicalizes. It hardens the fringes, pulls fence-sitters into extremism, and convinces people that violence is the only answer. This is exactly how terrorists want us to respond—and exactly how the architects of the police state exploit tragedy.

      Consider how quickly the machinery of state has leaped from one crisis to the next—each time extracting more power, each time normalizing control. After 9/11, Congress passed the Patriot Act within weeks, granting sweeping surveillance powers in the name of safety. When the COVID-19 pandemic arrived, measures like lockdowns, censorship, and mandatory tracking apps were touted as “temporary,” but many remain in modified form today.

      These moments follow a pattern—a classic Hegelian dialectic in overdrive:

      • Thesis: A crisis emerges (9/11, COVID, political violence, now the Kirk assassination).
      • Antithesis: Public panic demands security, scapegoats, authoritarian solutions.
      • Synthesis: The state consolidates more power—surveillance, censorship, deployment of security forces—then declares them necessary.

      Now, the Kirk killing is being spun precisely that way: shock, outrage, cry for order. The result? Stricter speech policing, weaponized security powers, and further erosion of civil liberties—sold to us as peace.

      Never forget the maxim: never let a good tragedy go to waste. The ruling class is already drooling. The technocrats, the security bureaucrats, the politicians who thrive on fear—they will point to Kirk’s murder as proof we need more surveillance, more militarization, more limits on speech. And frightened Americans, craving a facade of safety, will beg for the very chains that destroy liberty. They already are.

      But the police state will not restore order. It never does. Each new layer of force only convinces more people that their enemies control the system, fueling reprisals and revenge. That spiral doesn’t end in peace. It ends with the country crushed into rubble. And it won’t matter whether it was the left boot or the right boot doing the stomping. Everyone loses.

      That’s why the urge to misdirect rage must be resisted. When the left justifies political killings as defense against “fascism,” it validates paranoia on the right. When the right answers by calling for suspending rights or fantasizing about heads on spikes, it validates fear on the left. Meanwhile, sensible, innocent Americans are dragged toward a revolution no one asked for.

      Yes, many on the left want Marxism, excuse crime, and spew vile rhetoric. Yes, many on the right indulge white nationalism and dream of martial law. But these extremes are still minorities. They only grow when political assassinations are cheered, when peaceful speech is treated as violence, and when calls for more death go unanswered.

      Charlie Kirk’s killing isn’t a win for anyone. It’s a warning. Political murder, cheered by one side and answered with vengeance by the other, is how republics disintegrate. It’s how police states consolidate power. And it’s how ordinary people lose everything—freedom, law, safety—because they chose hate over restraint.

      The only way out of this spiral is to refuse the bait. Condemn political violence no matter who it targets. Defend free speech even when you hate the speaker. Reject the false security of surveillance and militarization. The ruling class thrives on fear, division, and blood; ordinary people do not have to. If Americans can remember that our real enemy isn’t each other but the machine that feeds on our division, we may still have time to stop the march toward rubble and reclaim a future worth handing down.

      Article posted with permission from Matt Agorist

      Matt Agorist

      Matt Agorist is an honorably discharged veteran of the USMC and former intelligence operator directly tasked by the NSA. This prior experience gives him unique insight into the world of government corruption and the American police state. Agorist has been an independent journalist for over a decade and has been featured on mainstream networks around the world. Agorist is also the Editor at Large at the Free Thought Project.

      All author posts